|
The New York Times ABOUT REAL ESTATE Less than a decade ago, few brokers represented buyers. Tom
Hathaway, president of the Buyer's Agent in Memphis, which has 50
franchise offices in 26 states, estimates that there are now 1,500
exclusive buyer brokers in business nationwide. His company, founded in
1988, added 20 franchise offices just last year, he said. It recently
helped create a National Association of Exclusive Buyer's Agents. Another franchiser, Buyer's Resource, based in Denver and founded
in 1989, now has 96 offices after adding 16 last year, according to a
spokesman, Gregg Stucker. Independent agents are also reporting an upswing
in business. Bethany D. Marten, owner of the Home Buyer's Resource Center
in Baldwin, L.I., for example, said her staff of 5 grew to 12 last year. Although a seller's broker, by law, is required to treat buyers
fairly and reveal anything that might adversely affect the potential sale
of a house, buyer brokers say they look for potential problems a seller
may not have disclosed, or might not even know. Buyer brokers say they can negotiate the best price for their
clients. "We act in a sense like an attorney or an accountant to
protect the buyer, so that they can make an informed decision and buy the
best home for them," Mr. Hathaway, the Memphis broker, said. Although there are variations, the buyer broker generally
receives the same amount as a seller broker's subagent who produces a
buyer. The amount that the seller receives for the home is the same as
would be the case if the home's purchaser had been found by an agent
representing the seller. Representation is something buyers could and should have had all
along, said Maureen F. Glasheen, a former general counsel to the New York
state Department of State and now a business and legal consultant in
Albany. She plans to become an executive of Buyer's Resource. "The
custom of the industry was to not offer the service, and initially to not
disclose that it wasn't being offered," Ms. Glycine said. Under the law of agency, an agent has fiduciary responsibilities
only to the client. Those responsibilities include undivided loyalty,
confidentiality and full disclosure. Any information offered by a buyer to
a seller's agent, for example, must be passed on to the seller. Confusion often arises because many buyers believe that the agent
who shows them houses works on their behalf. In fact, subagents of the
listing broker--often they are agents who work for another office--also
act on behalf of the seller. Disclosure laws that have helped clarify the
issue were adopted by most states in the 1980's after a 1983 report by the
Federal Trade Commission disclosed that three-quarters of buyers thought
the agent who showed them houses worked for them, and that most sellers
thought likewise. Many consumers "now understand that subagents do not
represent the buyer's interests, and that buyer brokers make a great deal
of sense," said Stephen Brobeck, executive director of the Consumer
Federation of America in Washington, an association of nonprofit consumer
groups. The National Association of Realtors takes the position that
buyers should be given a choice of all options. A recent poll of
homebuyers and sellers indicated that consumers most valued the
representational aspects of a broker's services, said Laourene Janik,
general counsel to the association. "Buyers should be given the
choice of having an agent represent them," she said. Listing brokers sometimes offer to act as buyer brokers, but
critics say that creates a conflict of interest. A new development has
been the emergence of the so-called transaction broker, a form of
brokerage that has been proposed in many states and that is permitted in
Colorado and Florida, among other states. A transaction broker is an independent contractor who puts
together a deal between a buyer and a seller without having fiduciary
responsibilities to either, said Marie Powell, president of the Florida
Association of Realtors, who endorses the idea. She called it a fair
solution for everyone because, she said, it also reduces liability on the
part of sellers and buyers for the actions of their agents, which in an
agency relationship they would have . For example, a seller can be held
liable if the seller's agent tells the buyer, without the seller's
knowledge, that the roof does not leak when in fact it does. Ms. Glycine, the Albany lawyer, called transaction brokerage a
betrayal of consumer rights. Now that consumers have discovered that both
parties in a real estate transaction are entitled to representation by
their own agent, "this protection is being taken away by some
legislatures," she said.
|
|